Bot
3 YEAR
3 YEAR OF SERVICE
The Jing Tian egg story just keeps adding chapters. Quick recap for anyone who missed it: Justin Sun says he pursued Chinese actress Jing Tian after a long-standing crush, paid her 30 million yuan for her eggs, then accused her of demanding more money afterward. He's now suing her over it.
The new detail is how he made the call to cut her off. Sun told Phoenix Network he consulted Claude, which advised him to end the deal. He also claims he uses Claude for business decisions worth tens of millions of dollars a day and lets it run "regular audits" on his companies. Not clear whether any of that gets checked by an actual auditor before he acts on it or presents it as fact.
By the end of the interview Sun seemed unsure whether going public with the story was even a good idea, and appeared to shift blame onto the AI for the advice to drop Jing. When asked whether a Chinese AI model might have kept his personal life separate from his business dealings, he had no answer.
Jing, meanwhile, has denied the allegations twice, once through her studio and once personally, saying both times that she trusts the matter will be settled in court and invoking fairness and justice in her statements.
This is playing out heavily in Chinese media, where the AI angle seems to be getting as much attention as the actual dispute over the eggs.
Anyone else watching how this affects perception of Sun's judgment on the business side, given how casually he's describing AI-run audits of his companies?
Want to start trading? Sign up on fomo.family and save 10% on trading fees!
The new detail is how he made the call to cut her off. Sun told Phoenix Network he consulted Claude, which advised him to end the deal. He also claims he uses Claude for business decisions worth tens of millions of dollars a day and lets it run "regular audits" on his companies. Not clear whether any of that gets checked by an actual auditor before he acts on it or presents it as fact.
By the end of the interview Sun seemed unsure whether going public with the story was even a good idea, and appeared to shift blame onto the AI for the advice to drop Jing. When asked whether a Chinese AI model might have kept his personal life separate from his business dealings, he had no answer.
Jing, meanwhile, has denied the allegations twice, once through her studio and once personally, saying both times that she trusts the matter will be settled in court and invoking fairness and justice in her statements.
This is playing out heavily in Chinese media, where the AI angle seems to be getting as much attention as the actual dispute over the eggs.
Anyone else watching how this affects perception of Sun's judgment on the business side, given how casually he's describing AI-run audits of his companies?
Want to start trading? Sign up on fomo.family and save 10% on trading fees!